Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 57 of 6217

We want use mashup to populate a new field in the quick add form based on selection of values of another field which is already existing in the form.

We want use mashup to populate a new field in the quick add form based on selection of values of another field which is already existing in the form. In the screenshot attached, when "WOTF" value is selected from the sourcing mechanism (Existing f...
about 6 hours ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 0 Submitted

Enhance Validation Rules with JavaScript Execution for Better Flexibility

As an ATP Targetprocess developer, I greatly appreciate the Targetprocess product for its robust features and customization options through automation rules, validation rules, metrics, and mashups. However, I have encountered challenges with the c...
22 days ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 0 Under review

Capability to hide certain object types from “Add” and “+” button 

Prevent users from creating unnecessary objects that clutter up the environment
16 days ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 0 Needs more information

Entity Split Screen Fields

As a person splitting an entity, I want all fields that are frequently used automatically populated. At this time, the fields on the split screen are predetermined. We would like the ability to manage which fields show for our users when splitting...
3 months ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 0 Future consideration

Want to be able to execute Automations from a specific Agent

Within the Action Catalog for executing automations, the target server can be selected if the Automation is run manually by a person. The person sees a list of available Agents and selects one. But, when executing the Actions in an automated way v...
9 months ago in Instana / Automation 0 Functionality already exists

Request Types Sortable by Numeric Value similar to Business Values

As an administrator, continuously iterating on the request types within my Targetprocess environment I have no convenient sorting functionality other than the alphanumeric sorting by Name for the type of request. If I have an sorting index similar...
23 days ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 0 Not under consideration

Enable configurable relationship types

Currently, a static list of possible relationship types exist as either Inbound or Outbound: Dependency, Blocker, Relation, Link or Duplicate. It would be value-add to allow removing relation types, renaming relation types, or adding relation type...
about 2 months ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 1 Not under consideration

Allow for manual save on Rich text Fields or Disable autosave

In certain usecases clients wish to restrict certain characters i.e ($%#) from being used in rich text custom fields. We are able to build VRs around restricting these characters, however from a UI perspective users are stuck in a VR message loop ...
26 days ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 1 Is a defect

Add Search Functionality in Entity History Section for Improved Field Tracking

Currently, each entity has a history section where we can see the update history of each field. When there are only a few fields, the current UI works well. However, for entities with 100+ fields that are kept for long periods, tracking the histor...
4 months ago in Targetprocess / User Experience 2 Planned for future release

Agent restriction to SaaS Backend

In an Instana SaaS environment where application server owners can onboard agents to the backend: Mechanisms to restrict what agents are allowed to report to the SaaS backend. A process to detect and remove any rogue agents that have been onbo...
about 2 months ago in Instana / Automation 0 Under review

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.