Skip to Main Content
Cloud and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Workspace Cloudability
Categories Anomaly Detection
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 17, 2026

Preserve First Detection Timestamp and Mitigate Historical Spike Bias in Anomaly Detection

Currently, Cloudability’s anomaly detection algorithm re-evaluates and regenerates anomalies for the previous seven days each time it runs. As a result, anomalies identified earlier may change or disappear over time as new cost data becomes available.

However, this approach introduces a potential limitation in scenarios where a significant cost spike occurs. A large historical spike can disproportionately influence the baseline, making the algorithm less sensitive to subsequent gradual cost increases. In such cases, a progressive upward trend—while potentially anomalous—may not be detected, or previously flagged anomalies may be removed due to the recalculation logic.

To improve the effectiveness and transparency of anomaly detection, I suggest the following enhancements:

1. Preserve the first occurrence of an anomaly

Even if anomalies are re-evaluated or later removed, the system should retain and display the initial timestamp when the anomaly was first detected. This provides better traceability and supports root cause analysis.

2. Reduce the influence of historical extreme spikes

The algorithm could introduce a decay factor or weighting adjustment for prior extreme spikes, ensuring that they do not overly distort future anomaly detection.

 

These improvements would help capture gradual cost increases more effectively and provide users with better visibility into anomaly evolution over time.

Idea priority Medium