Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace Instana
Categories Alert
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 15, 2024

Instana grouping in Analyze Calls for Smart Alert Event by blueprint template

If you jump from smart alert event to analytc by clicking on "Analyze Calls" the predefined grouping seems to be defaulted to 'by endpoint'.
It would help a lot if grouping would be done by templated blueprint criteria.

Idea priority Medium
  • Admin
    Máté Návay
    Reply
    |
    Jul 17, 2024

    Thank you for taking the time to provide your ideas to IBM. We truly value our relationship with you and appreciate your willingness to share details about your experience, your recommendations, and ideas.


    As the Log blueprint is being superseded by the new Smart Alert on Logs feature entirely, IBM has evaluated the request and has determined that it cannot be implemented at this time or does not align with our current strategy or roadmap.


    In 12 months, you will receive a notification that you can resubmit this request for consideration.


    Thank you for bringing your ideas to us. If you have any additional feedback, thoughts or ideas, or if there is anything else I can do, please do not hesitate to reply to this message to continue the conversation.

  • Admin
    Máté Návay
    Reply
    |
    Feb 26, 2024

    For the Logs blueprint we should be able to change to default grouping by log.message (as when alerting for just one log.level, grouping by level wouldn't be helpful)

    As for HTTP code blueprint we'll need to still check how common alert configs are where a single status code is used, as in this case too, grouping for just a single code would be suboptimal.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 20, 2024

    Hello Mate, many thanks for the clarification. In our case blueprint would be Logs or Http Status Code. For blueprint Logs grouping by log.level or better log.message, for blueprint Http Status Code by http.status would be favourable.

  • Admin
    Máté Návay
    Reply
    |
    Feb 20, 2024

    So, we do have some different groupings already. We just checked Smart Alerts for Applications to have the following:
    For Slowness blueprint: no grouping

    • For per-AP alerting: grouping by service.name

    • For per-Service alerting, or narrowed down to a single service by ID: by endpoint.name

    • For per-Endpoint alerting: by call.name

    • When scoped to a single endpoint: no grouping

    • For Throughput blueprint:

    • if expression-filter contains tags about service/endpoint: group by endpoint.name, otherwise service.name

    • Else: use default grouping from UA: endpoint.name

    So, if you have some specific examples where you'd like to see a different default grouping, please let me know and we can see if it's something we could add.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 19, 2024

    e.g. if the smart alert is built on blueprint log the "Analyze Calls" predefined grouping could be by log message or on blueprint http-code by http code (your example). Does this make sense!?

  • Admin
    Máté Návay
    Reply
    |
    Feb 19, 2024

    Could you please provide an example on which blueprint you'd like this?
    I can think of HTTP errors to group by the error codes, but other blueprints may not have a straightforward grouping possibility.