Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Under review
Workspace Instana
Categories MQ
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 27, 2025

Detecting/Alerting on poisoned queues for IBM MQ

One of our top 4 banking customers in Australia had a Sev 1 incident last week, where their Internet Banking was down for 1 hour due to a poisoned queue. This was not detected by any monitoring tool and took some time to get to the root cause and repair. 

Upon investigating into the matter I understood that Instana would have been able to alert on such incidents based on the message attribute BackoutCount, keeps track of the number of times the message was backed out to the queue. According to this article, Each time a message is backed out to the queue, the message attribute BackoutCount field (in the MQMD) is incremented by MQ itself. This means that the next time the message is GOT from the queue the BackoutCount field will be greater than zero (default value is 0).

Upon checking with the (issue detection team; link to the slack threat provided), it was determined that the message attributes are extracted as text fields, hence checking for BackoutCount > 0 condition is not possible. Speaking to MQ SMEs, I learned that BackoutCount “does not equal" 0 should not implicate a poisoned queues as some times on the second attempt the message is retrieved. Hence the recommendation was to let the customer decide what the threshold should be for BackoutCount. 

So the ask here is for the BackoutCount field to be extracted as an numeric/integer field so the numeric operators could be applied in event conditions. 

Idea priority High