Skip to Main Content
Cloud and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Workspace Targetprocess
Categories User Management
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 23, 2026

Targetprocess API currently bypasses UI-configured required field enforcement, allowing records to be created with missing required fields unless a separate Validation Rule exists.

Today, Targetprocess only enforces most required fields in the UI layer. As a result, items created through the API can bypass these required field checks unless a separate Validation Rule has been created. This creates inconsistent behavior between users creating items in the UI and integrations, automations, MCP servers, AI agents, or custom applications creating items through the API.

This enhancement would benefit organizations that rely on APIs, integrations, AI assistants, automation platforms, and third-party tools to create or update data in Targetprocess. It would improve data quality, reduce administrative overhead, and ensure a consistent user experience regardless of how data enters the system.

The proposed solution is to provide server-side enforcement of required fields so that any field marked as required is validated consistently across both the UI and API. If a required field is missing, the API should return a validation error similar to existing Validation Rules. Alternatively, the API should expose a comprehensive metadata endpoint that identifies all required fields (including those configured through Quick Add or other UI-based configurations) so external systems can dynamically determine and enforce field requirements before submitting requests. This would eliminate the need to create and maintain individual Validation Rules solely to enforce required fields.

Idea priority Urgent
  • Guest
    Jul 27, 2026

    Alternative Solution: Automatically Generate Validation Rules for Required Fields

    The proposed solution is for Targetprocess to automatically generate and maintain backend Validation Rules whenever a field is configured as Required. When an administrator marks a field as required, the platform would create the corresponding server-side validation behind the scenes. If the field is later made optional, the associated validation would be automatically removed or updated. This would provide a single source of truth for field requirements, eliminate the need for administrators to create and maintain separate Validation Rules, and ensure consistent enforcement across all entry points into the system.