Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

PINNED Configure maintenance flyouts
User interface settings include the option “Show maintenance notes”. How can I as onprem-backend administrator configure and switch on such flyouts to inform my users about upcoming maintenance?
Share feedback 2

All ideas

Showing 1811

Need feature enhancement for device and object group creation

Currently, when creating a device group using metadata, the model defaults to OR logic and does not support using two or more metadata fields with AND logic. We request a feature that allows the use of AND logic for more precise group creation.
4 days ago in SevOne / Network Management System (NMS) 0 Future consideration

Flow Rules and grouping Collectors

I would like a way to have a group of flow collectors in SevOne grouped then be able to use that group inside flow rules. Thus allowing me to have a USA group, An EMEA group and so on. Now I can easily say "For all flow collectors in the DNC_Japan...
10 days ago in SevOne / Network Management System (NMS) 2 Future consideration

Display clients by Username or Computer Name in Flow report instead of IP address.

"Flow - Top Apps and Categories Detail" report is very nice.It is useful for me to find a user who most access the specific application by checking the "Top Apps > Top Clients" widget. But this widget displays clients by IP address. This is a b...
11 days ago in SevOne / Network Management System (NMS) 1 Future consideration

Enable Option to Restrict Output in TopN or Performance Report When Device Group is Selected in a Variables option in DI report

Overview: When creating a report in DI (Data Insight), selecting a device group in the variables option results in displaying data for all devices and objects under that group. For example, if a site is selected as the device group and it contains...
12 days ago in SevOne / Data Insight (DI) 0 Future consideration

Provide scheduling recommendations

Would be great if Cloudability would provide recommendations on what (compute) resources to put on a schedule (e.g. start/stop on the weekends) and if we can also create a Cloudability issue for this that enables us to track the savings.
13 days ago in Cloudability / Workload Optimization (Rightsizing) 0 Future consideration

To Exports Targets from Targets section

This would be useful as all other exports that are used for cost board packs for ex co come from Apptio Planning barr the targets as you cannot export them.
14 days ago in Apptio / Apptio Planning 0 Future consideration

New KPI/Filter - Lamda/Fargate Workload Coverage $

Initial response from our account team: "I don’t believe we break it out by service, so CLDY would be the best bet". We would like for a KPI/Filter to be created, so we don't have to manually figure out. Under RI Utilization, you are able to filte...
17 days ago in Cloudability / Cloudability Savings Automation 0 Future consideration

New KPI - SP Commitment in $/hour

Initial response from our account team: "We don’t explicitly report this value, but in the SI inventory you could grab the inventory and meta data to back out the $/hour if you were curious." We would like for a KPI to be created, so we don't have...
17 days ago in Cloudability / Cloudability Savings Automation 0 Future consideration

monitor QoE score for tunnel objects in CCSDWAN

There is a requirement to monitor QoE score available against the SDWAN tunnel objects for Cisco SDWAN devices. On vManage when a device is selected, under tunnels section we can see jitter, packet loss, and Latency values per tunnel. Similarly, w...
17 days ago in SevOne / Software Defined WAN (SDWAN) 0 Future consideration

Monitor Jitter, Latency and loss for TLOC available in vManage.

Requirement is to monitor Jitter, Latency and loss for the TLOC. these are aggregated values provided per color instead of per tunnel object. this will be useful for users to analyze the overall latency, jitter and loss. We have attached a screens...
17 days ago in SevOne / Software Defined WAN (SDWAN) 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.