We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive notifications on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
Please use the following category to raise ideas for these offerings for all environments (traditional on-premises, containers, cloud):
Cloud Pak for Multicloud Management
Cloud Pak for Network Automation - incl Orchestration and Performance Management
Cloud Pak for Watson AIOps - incl Netcool Operations Management portfolio
Edge Application Manager
IBM Observability with Instana
ITM-APM Products - incl IBM Tivoli Monitoring v6 and Application Performance Monitoring v8
Workload Automation - incl Workload Scheduler
Tivoli System Automation - inc Tivoli System Automation Application Manager (SA AM), Tivoli System Automation for Multiplatforms (SA MP)
When scanning vulnereability of our application server(s), we've noticed that JBoss 4.x is no longer supported by Red Hat, which caused vulnerability flags. We've been informed that JBoss itself is tightly integrated with TNPMW application, so upg...
Adding default component statuses logging to default logging level
In cases TS004816821 and TS004896360 the customer faced problems with setting an optimal debug level to monitor the status of components. In case TS004816821 the customer had a fatal error when LDR did not send any data for approximately 4 days. I...
Current Behavior of the tool :In ECU.WORX.ALM work Item perspective, only text editor is set by default for text files. But If user tries to open other files like *.mic,xml, etc. it gives an error.Enhancement Request:To show other files content li...
TNPM. Dynamic Y-axis and threshold line for Resource DetailedReport
TNPM. This problem is actual for the Customer because it is not comfortable to work with report when metric values are less than 10%, and threshold is 80%. Everything is very small on such graph. Besides threshold value is useless on graph if me...
TNPM Request to change old data purge logic to remove dbf files using DB drop tablespace statement
To correctly conduct disk space management on standby database customer needs to change the way the purge script remove dbf files.Now it uses OS rm command and they need that dbf files get deleted usingsql statement DROP TABLESPACE with option "IN...
CommonPack Models (Application Studio): Changing BH_VALUE field name in the SBH Definition area to the counter name
The new structure of Common Pack models (CP) introduced with TNPMW v1.4.1 changed the whole logic of the busy hours (BH).It was discovered that the so called BH determiner does not come from the same source tables as it was in the old method, but ...
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.