Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 1435

SQL Server Target Enhancement

Hi Team, Currently we can add only one port for SQL server Database targets but if there are multiple SQL server instances with different ports then we need to add multiple targets so I would suggest there should be option to add multiple ports in...
5 months ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / APM & Applications & Databases 0 Future consideration

To be able to control how broker jobs execute, alphabetically vs based on start time.

Currently dynamic broker jobs execute in alphabetical order and if jobs back up for any reason, then jobs at higher alphabet order execute first and lower alphabet jobs wait even though start time was in past. This causes SLA's to be missed and no...
almost 2 years ago in Workload Automation 0 Future consideration

Custom Dashboard editing permission based on groups

Permission for team members based on user groups for editing custom dashboards. Business Use CaseCustomer have teams working 24x7 and in case if an on-shift person wants to edit the dashboards they need to explicitly grant permission to edit.They ...
almost 4 years ago in Instana / Access Control / Infrastructure 1 Future consideration

Complete containment model for the device

StarHub requested a complete containment model for the device
5 months ago in SevOne / Other 2 Future consideration

Ability to understand what’s connected to the Network

Need ability to understand what’s connected to SevOne even though it’s not managing them, for e.g. IT-to-network and ASN peer correlation
5 months ago in SevOne / Other 2 Future consideration

Impact - Automatic replication of Opviews and assets

Automatic replication of Opviews and assets. Easier to do correct and more efficient administration.
5 months ago in IBM Cloud Pak for AIOps 0 Future consideration

Impact - Update the rhino engine to something that can run > ES6

Support > ES6 standard.
5 months ago in IBM Cloud Pak for AIOps 0 Future consideration

Impact - role assigment in Impact

Add option for role assignment via Impact GUI, so the user is not forced to implement via CLI.
5 months ago in IBM Cloud Pak for AIOps 0 Future consideration

Impact - Patching redundant system without downtime

Partner needs to be able to patch a redundant system without downtime. Should ensure that CVS is not overwritten or corrupted during patching.
5 months ago in IBM Cloud Pak for AIOps 0 Future consideration

Allow for CPU Increment Size in vCPU Scaling Controlsto be extrapolated from "Change" field

We, like many customers, require the ability to increment by 2 (avoid odd number of cores) regardless of scaling control type. Currently, the tool only allows for that to be adjusted if we change "Virtual CPU". We need more granularity in ways we ...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Policies 0 Future consideration