Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Turbonomic ARM

Showing 575

POD Placement: Error Details insufficient for "Failed to start action... due to error"

Failed POD moves do not say why the Failed to start action ended in an error and what that error is. A long number is shown with in not informative. Can you link the number to a meaning and present that in the error output?
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Container Platforms (K8s & OpenShift) 1 Is a defect

add AWS resource ID to report column options

I am trying to correlate the scaling recommendations in turbonomics to an AWS cost report, and I can't find a good field to join on (the aws report doesn't have instance name). if the turbonomic report had the instanceID, that would do it for me
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Reporting 0 Not under consideration

The ability to add a custom date range on the top of a page so it propagates to all the graphs – like the limited default selections do now.

Ability to view data within a specific scope.
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Reporting 1 Functionality already exists

The ability to download a list of group members and a 'download page' option so that all data is easily exportable

This will be useful for the client when needing to export data for other members in the organization to view.
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / UI & User Experience 0 Planned for future release

Turbonomic may not properly display costs when using a non USD currency

When a currency is changed from USD, costs may not be properly displayed in charts other than Top Accounts. For instance, the cost IS displayed properly for Yen, but NOT displayed properly for the Norwegian Krone
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / UI & User Experience 0 Is a defect

Add Timeframes: Last Month, This Month

All cloud providers work in Calendar months. Each calendar month, a cloud vendor issues an invoice for all consumption in the previous month. Therefore, in a FinOps environment, every customer wants to understand the following: "what did I actuall...
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / UI & User Experience 0 Future consideration

New Role to delegate administration at a logical grouping of targets ( SubTenant)

For Enterprises that has multiple departments, with each having their own requirements, it will be difficult to manage the administration centrally. I will be very helpful to have a subtenant (logical) and have an administrator role at that level,...
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / General/Other 1 Not under consideration

Supported migration path to new OVA deployment

Allow configuration data and historical data to be migrated from one XL deployment to a new XL OVA deployment. This would benefit all users who wish to deploy a newer version of the OVA for security or other reasons and remove the need for a lot o...
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / General/Other 1 Not under consideration

Display the actual state of a resource in an "Unavailable" state

In legacy PMC, today, we would mark a resource in an "Unavailable" state because the actual state of this resource is not explicitly mapped. This is an issue for the user because it is unclear what error state this resource is in and so there is n...
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / UI & User Experience 0 Planned for future release

Add Citrix Hypervisor support to the main stream hypervisor support in Turbonomic

Citrix targets and support for its targets are not prime time at the moment in Turbonomic.
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / On-Premises (Hypervisor & Storage & Network) 1 Not under consideration