This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
The Technical Service Layer that the OOTB-model tries to use is too simplified for the use cases of our clients:
More specifically there is currently not the possibility of allocating cost to a technology service by applying offering ID.
In the workbench, we have the possibility to select an offering ID when mapping a vendor or labor to a technology service.
Yet, it seems like the model is only build to support allocation through solution type and solution category when it is a technology service. Can we simply add a new data relationship within the model to fix this issue allowing us to allocate labor or vendor to a technical service offering. We did a quick-fix with the FLS-case after we had a talk with you back in October, but there is a need to consistently be able allocate to a technical service offering. Afterward, there is a need to be able to allocate technical service offering in the Workbench to a "business-facing" solution offering.
Idea priority | High |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Hi IBM
I agree that this can be modified in the OOTB configuration. The logic of the allocations are still quite different, as the allocations are based on expected storage and compute spend.
Instead, I want to flip the allocations around, so you determine how much a "business-facing service" consumes of a specific technical service. I would like to elaborate this via a meeting to clarify further, as I do not think it is quite straightforward to modify the OOTB configuration.
Kind regards
Jeppe Reuther
Deloitte
For an individual project configuration, Apptio and Partner administrators can modify the OOTB configuration to extend the allocation rules to a more granular level. In this example, allocate to Solution Name (level 3, where Solution Type = L1, Solution Category = L2).
We are considering including this level of granularity in a future Costing Essentials enhancement. At this point, it has not been prioritized or committed to a specific release.