This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Board Review:
Will be taken for consideration for potential future evolutions of the cloudpak.
Hi Matt, this is on authentication and authorization for multi-tenancy for both customers and service providers (e.g IBM). Tenant can be at customer level and or within customer level (LOBs). Tenents can be customers for self-service or authorized IBM personnels to access onbehalf of customers.
Sai, in these use cases it sounds like the tenants (customers) would not access the CP4MCM console. I think we also need to consider the scenarios where the multiple tenants access the CP4MCM console and can only view/take action on objects for their tenant.