This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Hi Jeremy,
the scenario I have in mind is the following:
a hybrid installation of Watson AIOps (with ASM on OCP) running a Netdisco observer is in place. There are some networks that are not reachable externally (the traffic from outside is not allowed) so a local discovery would be necessary. The question is: can we install a local and separate ASM netdisco observer on a VM and push the discovery data to the central ASM (the traffic in that direction is allowed) and having that topology merged with the previous one discovered by the Netdisco oberver on OCP?
I'm not able to understand this by the documentation.
Many thanks
Thank you for your request. Please would you review the documentation for installing the ASM services as this notes that you would typically install NetDisco on it’s own server. The doc is here
And
So the
nasm-netdisco-observer
package would be on the core ASM server but all the NetDisco packages would have a dedicated server.Can this be used to satisfy your requirement?