Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps

This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 24, 2023

Simplify ACL/SDOM management with IWS >9.5


Currently we use SDOM structure to limit our applicative manager to their application and to force norm usage.

For exemple - For Job name:

3 characters for application code (CCX)

1 character for job type (one of these 3 letters XTM)

1 character for schedule type (one of these letters QMAOPRWD1234567E)

then 3 charactere free than _ than 3charactere free

Then 1 caractere for monitoring type (one of these letter B or S)

we could perform this need with one simple


to do that we implements these lines - it's not easy to manage:

JOB NAME="CCXXQ???_???S_@","CCXXM???_???S_@","CCXXA???_???S_@","CCXXO???_???S_@","CCXXP???_???S_@","CCXXR???_???S_@","CCXXC???_???S_@","CCXXW???_???S_@","CCXXD???_???S_@","CCXX1???_???S_@","CCXX2???_???S_@","CCXX3???_???S_@","CCXX4???_???S_@","CCXX5???_???S_@","CCXX6???_???S_@","CCXX7???_???S_@","CCXXE???_???S_@"

JOB NAME="CCXXQ???_???B_@","CCXXM???_???B_@","CCXXA???_???B_@","CCXXO???_???B_@","CCXXP???_???B_@","CCXXR???_???B_@","CCXXC???_???B_@","CCXXW???_???B_@","CCXXD???_???B_@","CCXX1???_???B_@","CCXX2???_???B_@","CCXX3???_???B_@","CCXX4???_???B_@","CCXX5???_???B_@","CCXX6???_???B_@","CCXX7???_???B_@","CCXXE???_???B_@"

JOB NAME="CCXTQ???_???S_@","CCXTM???_???S_@","CCXTA???_???S_@","CCXTO???_???S_@","CCXTP???_???S_@","CCXTR???_???S_@","CCXTC???_???S_@","CCXTW???_???S_@","CCXTD???_???S_@","CCXT1???_???S_@","CCXT2???_???S_@","CCXT3???_???S_@","CCXT4???_???S_@","CCXT5???_???S_@","CCXT6???_???S_@","CCXT7???_???S_@","CCXTE???_???S_@"

JOB NAME="CCXTQ???_???B_@","CCXTM???_???B_@","CCXTA???_???B_@","CCXTO???_???B_@","CCXTP???_???B_@","CCXTR???_???B_@","CCXTC???_???B_@","CCXTW???_???B_@","CCXTD???_???B_@","CCXT1???_???B_@","CCXT2???_???B_@","CCXT3???_???B_@","CCXT4???_???B_@","CCXT5???_???B_@","CCXT6???_???B_@","CCXT7???_???B_@","CCXTE???_???B_@"

JOB NAME="CCXMQ???_???S_@","CCXMM???_???S_@","CCXMA???_???S_@","CCXMO???_???S_@","CCXMP???_???S_@","CCXMR???_???S_@","CCXMC???_???S_@","CCXMW???_???S_@","CCXMD???_???S_@","CCXM1???_???S_@","CCXM2???_???S_@","CCXM3???_???S_@","CCXM4???_???S_@","CCXM5???_???S_@","CCXM6???_???S_@","CCXM7???_???S_@","CCXME???_???S_@"

JOB NAME="CCXMQ???_???B_@","CCXMM???_???B_@","CCXMA???_???B_@","CCXMO???_???B_@","CCXMP???_???B_@","CCXMR???_???B_@","CCXMC???_???B_@","CCXMW???_???B_@","CCXMD???_???B_@","CCXM1???_???B_@","CCXM2???_???B_@","CCXM3???_???B_@","CCXM4???_???B_@","CCXM5???_???B_@","CCXM6???_???B_@","CCXM7???_???B_@","CCXME???_???B_@"

Idea priority High
  • Admin
    Marco Cardelli
    Mar 23, 2023

    Why don't you use our workflow folders to implement this scenario? It should be much easier. Please let us know if this could be a solution and if not why.

    6 replies
  • Guest
    Mar 2, 2023

    Just let the possibility to use joker caracters @ is ok but "?" does not work on security definition like in object selections.

    1 reply