Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My subscriptions: Performance

Showing 19

TNPM. Upgrade of JBoss to RHEL supported version

When scanning vulnereability of our application server(s), we've noticed that JBoss 4.x is no longer supported by Red Hat, which caused vulnerability flags. We've been informed that JBoss itself is tightly integrated with TNPMW application, so upg...
over 2 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 2 Not under consideration

Adding default component statuses logging to default logging level

In cases TS004816821 and TS004896360 the customer faced problems with setting an optimal debug level to monitor the status of components. In case TS004816821 the customer had a fatal error when LDR did not send any data for approximately 4 days. I...
over 3 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 0 Not under consideration

TNPM. Dynamic Y-axis and threshold line for Resource DetailedReport

TNPM. This problem is actual for the Customer because it is not comfortable to work with report when metric values ​​are less than 10%, and threshold is 80%. Everything is very small on such graph. Besides threshold value is useless on graph if me...
almost 4 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 0 Not under consideration

TNPM. Show Realtime Report - without Java

Currently the Realtime Reports are entitled to run using the Java Show Realtime Report - You can go into this mode through Define Resource View when switching to any interface of any node
over 4 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 1 Not under consideration

(NPI) Ability to modify Traffic Volume Trend graph to view bandwidth by interface/circuit

Would like the ability to modify the Traffic Volume Trend graph to view the bandwidth used based on a specific interface and/or circuit, by percentage of bandwidth used (i.e. 0-100%).
over 3 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 1 Not under consideration

Improved monitoring of TNPM

Improved monitoring of TNPM data processing. Monitoring via ITM of all data processing should be available (including summaries and BHs), partition maintenance etc.
almost 11 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 3 Not under consideration

TNPM. Cisco Device Tech pack to discover virtual interfaces for MPLS devices when physical and virual interface have same ifName

Cisco Device Tech pack cannot discover virtual interfaces for MPLS Cisco devices. Because of that it is not possible to monitor any KPI for these interfaces. This means it is not possible to monitor even MIB II KPIs for these virtual interfaces, a...
almost 12 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 4 Not under consideration

Sector Busy Hour

Requirements from customer to have Sector Busy Hour calculation. Using the following small example, where we have the LTE Cells which belong to the same eNodeB “JHRTJML” LTE Cell Name Band Cell ID Sector JHRTJML_103 L26 103 S3 JHRTJML_102 L26 102 ...
almost 2 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 0 Not under consideration

Performance alarm storage in TNCP database

Currently performance alarms are triggered from threshold configuration in TNCP. However the data of what has been raised, when, etc are not stored. We can only get current snapshot of alarms, not history. Customer has a requirement for a report, ...
almost 2 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 0 Not under consideration

TNPM 1.4.5 topology: how to specify 'file' for the UBA acquisition

Not able to add file option in URI path in the TNPM topology editor. By default/dropdown only sftp/ftp options are available. Some of the components (e.g. UBA) acquire their files from the local file system (either SAN mounted or LOCAL disks). The...
almost 3 years ago in Cloud Pak for Network Automation / Performance 1 Not under consideration