Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 27 of 6255

Plan Migration to show a cost comparison between migrating to the different cloud providers

Instead of a user creating 3 plans (one for each provider) and moving between dashboards to compare. A customer wanted to see a single dashboard comparing the possible migrations to all clouds to decide on the best one.
over 2 years ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Planning 0 Not under consideration

The plan function should include migration of SQL Managed Instances from on prem to the cloud.

These are very expensive entities - and the ability to estimate costs would be good. Also important, some customers use the exported plan as an input into a semi-automated migration process. So being able to include SQL machines in the planning fu...
about 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Planning 0 Planned for future release

RI plans for items other than VM

Volumes, SQL Databases (vCore), Blob storage? Other RI plans / Savings plan projections would be excessively useful!
8 months ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Planning 2 Future consideration

IBM SevOne NPM TMForum API standard usage and adoption

Create a simpler System to System digital data communication or exchange and scalable integration based on the variety of TMForum APIs (i.e. 621, 639 or 642)
over 1 year ago in SevOne / Other 3 Future consideration

"Select All" doesn't select All

While working with Wells Fargo on their new Turbo deployment, we were going through and running plans and after running through many plans, we realized that there were not near as many vm's in the plans as their should be. We went back and went th...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Planning 1 Planned for future release

for a user to share a PLAN with another users, OR ...somehow make the PLAN accessible by other users.

for a user to share a PLAN with another users, OR ...somehow make the PLAN accessible by other users. If I create a PLAN on turbonomic, I would like some other users to be able to see/run that PLAN. Need a way to share a PLAN or to make certain PL...
about 2 years ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Planning 5 Future consideration

Plan improvements: Downloading all plan results

Turbonomic planning allows us to simulate scenarios to migrate workloads to different clusters to simulate how workloads could be supported on different node sizes. This is a workaround to having Turbo recommend what vertical size node would be be...
over 1 year ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Planning 0 Planned for future release

Complete containment model for the device

StarHub requested a complete containment model for the device
over 1 year ago in SevOne / Other 2 Future consideration

SevOne observer uses API that requires deviceId/objectId in query parameter.

SevOne observer uses API that requires deviceId/objectId in query parameter. This will impact the observer performance in the long run
over 1 year ago in SevOne / Other 3 Not under consideration

Ability to understand what’s connected to the Network

Need ability to understand what’s connected to SevOne even though it’s not managing them, for e.g. IT-to-network and ASN peer correlation
over 1 year ago in SevOne / Other 2 Future consideration