Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps
Hide about this portal


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Freezing of a Scenario in Costing Essentials

See this idea on ideas.ibm.com

The ability to lock a scenario, so future changes does not affect the current scenario.

The reason this is really needed, is for Finance and CIO to freeze a budget on both a financial level, but also on allocations throughout the year. This is what we have experienced on FLS, and what we know our future clients will need.

When the IT-department has created the budget and done the expected allocations, they want to showcase this to the Finance team. During the year, there might be discrepancies between the expected model, and the actual model (changes in FTE's in IT or the business, new services in the IT-departmen, . The changes of the model, should be affected in the actuals, but not on the budget level so you are actually able to compare your budget towards your actuals cost.

 

For us, this is one of the most important additions to the essentials platform, as this lays the foundation of having conversations with the business regarding your IT-spend.

Idea priority Urgent
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 11, 2025

    Hi

    Thanks for the answer. I'll give some comments to the different perspectives and where I could see some challenges:

    1. This could be possible, but I think the reporting will be very difficult to configure then. You want to have a freezed budget, but you want to be able to compare that to the actuals. If it is a snapshot in an entirely different environment, the reporting between budget and actuals would be quite difficult.

    2. I think this perspective is quite good and would make sense. What is important to be aware of, is that it is not only the allocations that should be locked, but somewhat also some of the master data. 
    Lets say you have a service that you are allocating based on headcount to the organizations. In the budget, you expected that there would be 200 employees. During the FY, the amount of employees increase to 300, but it is important that the budget still allocates, as if there is only 200 employees in the organization.

    3. I think i need to understand this functionality a bit better. Would you then copy all tables with allocations related to the budget, and have that as a flat table, to show budget numbers across spend drivers, solutions and the consumers? This could probably also work as an easy fix, but I am afraid that the reporting between the "copied tables" and non-copied tables could cause some issues (there would no longer be a connection between the different models. As an example, how would the reporting show the solutions cost from different vendors, if it a copied table? I think it is important that this is still possible.

    Let me know if we should take a call regarding this.

  • Admin
    Ed Hayman
    Reply
    |
    Apr 8, 2025

    There are a few different ways we can accomplish your request. I'd like to better understand the desired process workflow.

    1. Create a "Snapshot" Branch which will duplicate the project at that point in time and will not allow any changes to the project (no table uploads, no configuration changes). This would be a snapshot of the entire environment including Actuals and Budget.

    2. Allow the project to continue to be updated from an Actuals perspective. This would include data as well as configuration changes. However, lock the Budget from ever changing. This may require the following: a) lock the Budget source data pipeline so a new version cannot be uploaded during the current fiscal year (new platform feature if done systematically); b) separate any budget-based model allocations so that changes can made in the Cost model allocations are independent of the budget allocations (this could be done with configuration changes to the model allocations where we may use the same in the current OOTB config). There is no way to "systematically" lock any changes being made to the Budget modeled metric.

    3. Use CopyTable() to copy the modeled and calculated metrics for the Budget and saves it to a "flat file". This is what is commonly done for Chargeback to see a permanent view for each month.

    Please let me know what specific option is more aligned with your expectations.

    Thanks,

    Ed

  • Admin
    Mark Thompson
    Reply
    |
    Apr 7, 2025

    This is a feature that would need to be part of TBM Studio as opposed to a specific solution area.