We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive notifications on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
Please use the following category to raise ideas for these offerings for all environments (traditional on-premises, containers, cloud):
Cloud Pak for Multicloud Management
Cloud Pak for Network Automation - incl Orchestration and Performance Management
Cloud Pak for Watson AIOps - incl Netcool Operations Management portfolio
Edge Application Manager
IBM Observability with Instana
ITM-APM Products - incl IBM Tivoli Monitoring v6 and Application Performance Monitoring v8
Workload Automation - incl Workload Scheduler
Tivoli System Automation - inc Tivoli System Automation Application Manager (SA AM), Tivoli System Automation for Multiplatforms (SA MP)
Despite setting more than 3 times the heap size for JAVA_MAX_MEM (eg. 512m) over the nominal memory usage (eg. average below 140m) as observed in a production environment, it can happen under peak loads or several circumstances that the agent gets into OOM. To recover from such issue, a manual systemctl restart of the service yield to restoration of the service to "normal" resource consumption usage.
It is worth noting that automatic restart depends on the how the agent got started. An agent running via kubernetes could be restarted based on the configuration. But when the agent is extracted and/or installed via package them the agent is not able to recover from a hard crash like OOM.
The proposal is to for the agent to detect OOM status to self-recover from OOM crash. The systemctl service has auto-restart service unit but the agent does not seem to return correct failure code under OOM situation. It would be desired to have auto-recovery means for the agent.
The benefit of doing so would be:
prevent manual restart operation (toil)
prevent "out-of-the-band" automation script to recover (ie clean self recovery)
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.