Skip to Main Content
Cloud Management and AIOps


This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 6069

Instana run under a non-root after installation (Standard Edition)

Customer is expecting that all Instana processes should run under a non-root user after issuing stanctl up command. We were advice (by an Instana site reliability engineer) to do the following and if would solve the problem but it did not: copy /r...
5 months ago in Instana / Self Hosted 0 Under review

Application Perspective creation improvements

When creating/updating an AP following improvements are suggested: - A "notes" field writing in for which purpose this AP was created- A "tag" field in which tags can be entered manually which can be used in the AP overview to group by.
almost 3 years ago in Instana / Extend Capabilities 1 Future consideration

Option to disable the Daily emails on cost summary for across the Org

Hi Team, an option to disable the daily cloud cost summaries emails sent to users would be great, as customer has mentioned the email is irrelevant to the most stakeholders in the org, and currently we cannot disable the emails for other users, ev...
3 months ago in Cloudability / Other 2 Not under consideration

Add RDS Customizations to Rightsizing Preferences Page

This would allow for the customization of what recommendations are being made for RDS, either by usage family, costs, etc
8 months ago in Cloudability / Workload Optimization (Rightsizing) 1 Future consideration

Request to Include Cisco ACI in Turbonomic Integration Support

Dear Turbonomic Product Team, We have received strong interest from one of our enterprise customers in expanding their adoption of IBM Turbonomic across their hybrid infrastructure. However, a key blocker they are facing is the lack of native inte...
5 months ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / On-Premises (Hypervisor & Storage & Network) 1 Not under consideration

Actions for Cloud SQL on GCP

Hello friends. A client migrated part of their applications from Azure to GCP. After migration, the client applied a series of cost-saving actions, but they missed actions for PaaS databases on GCP, actions that they had on Azure. My suggestion/re...
8 months ago in IBM Turbonomic ARM / Public Cloud PaaS & DBaaS 0 Future consideration

Expose View Details to Non Admins

We would like our end users to have visibility into how a View is created, but without giving them rights to create/edit views. This will empower them to fully understand how a view is defined. We should give read-only access to View tab to non-ad...
about 2 months ago in Cloudability / Cloudability Government 0 Future consideration

Migrating catalogues from 9.5 to 10.1.

There's no documented procedure for migrating catalogs from 9.5 to 10.1 , need one to ensure migration goes smoothly.With requirements , plugins (if needed etc,).
about 2 months ago in Workload Automation 1 Not under consideration

Allow view of all testing entities in single views in an intuitive hierarchy

Currently, Targetprocess uses Test Plans, Cases and Runs in a somewhat confusing manner. Individual steps must be contained in Test Cases, but it is not possible to simply run a Test Case. These must be attached to Test Plans and then run as a Tes...
about 2 months ago in Targetprocess / Other 1 Not under consideration

Attachments must go with Test Runs. Currently, attaching screenshots during Test Runs is unusable because they are attached to Test Cases rather than Test Runs.

Currently, Test Plans can contain other Test Plans as well as Test Cases. Test Cases hold the individual steps to be used in each run. Therefore they are the primary repeatable template for all testing, used in each run. The results of individual ...
about 2 months ago in Targetprocess / Other 1 Not under consideration