This is an IBM Automation portal for Cloud Management, Technology Cost Management, Network Automation and AIOps products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Hi Simon,
The use case you describe is what we would like to do. For example, we have superclusters that consist of both SAN and vSAN storage. We would like to create groups of VMs under a certain used size and direct those to the vSAN, and conversely restrict very large storage footprint VMs from making their way into our vSAN clusters. This is all in an effort to ensure our vSAN compute and storage are both utilized to efficiently. Today, without this ability we are seeing large sized VMs make their way to vSAN and consume all the storage before effectively using the compute. Not an issue in SAN where we can easily add more storage but for vSAN we don't have that ability.
Thanks for the idea Andrew.
Can you share a little about what outcome you would drive if you had these filters? Perhaps groups of VM's over a certain size to scope a policy to schedule storage migrations within an execution window?
If others would like to see these filters then please upvote and comment.
Thanks.